Finally, Ethanol does out compete gasoline, 5 more years
 it will be 50% of gasoline GHG Emissions.

Don’t forget NH3 has the lowest Carbon Footprint of all commercial
nitrogen fertilizers in production of corn for Ethanol.

Report finds ethanol has lower emissions than gasoline

A report, A Life-Cycle Analysis of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn-Based Ethanol, has found that GHG emissions associated with corn-based ethanol in the United States are about 43% lower than gasoline when measured on an energy-equivalent basis.

The report, prepared for the USDA Climate Change Program Office by ICF, found greater life cycle GHG benefits from corn ethanol than a number of earlier studies did, driven by improvements in ethanol production.

Farmers are producing corn more efficiently and using conservation practices that reduce GHG emissions, including reduced tillage (Mustang Openers help by banding deep to 7 inches in No-tillage), cover crops and improved nitrogen management, (Exactrix TAPPS formulators at .583 lbs. N instead of 1.1 lbs N as per the University recommendation.) N Sources such as Urea and Solution 32 often require 2 to 3 times more N than Exactrix TAPPS. A poor application process results with the secondary nitrogen materials such as 32-0-0. Primary Nitrogen is Anhydrous Ammonia at 82.4% N.

Corn yields have increased by more than 10% between 2005 and 2015.

Between 2005 and 2015, ethanol production in the United States also increased significantly, from 3.9 billion to 14.8 billion gallons per year.

Advances in ethanol production technologies, such as the use of combined heat and power, using landfill gas for energy and co-producing biodiesel, helped reduce GHG emissions at ethanol plants.

By 2022, the GHG profile of corn-based ethanol is expected to be almost 50% lower than gasoline.

Good News for Exactrix Owners.
GJS

Here is something you did not know.
 Ammonia Prices are now purposely quoted too high.

With Farmland, NH3 Pricing would be $125 to $197 per ton. 7.6 to 12 cents per lb. of N.

It is not how they taught us in High School Economics and the history books, the free enterprise system works well, it presently does not. Those text books from the 50’s and 60’s will not work in today’s classroom.

The problem with the press writers is they have rose colored glasses, thinking everything is true as reported by the fertilizer manufacturer or dealer which could today be the same with vertical integration.

The Agricultural Press such as DTN does not report the true deals since the information is harder to get.

They think the fertilizer manufacturers and dealers are honest and give the customer the benefit of the doubt. Fertilizer manufacturers are Oligopolies with no regional competitor in many parts of the US and Canada.

Right now the fertilizer industry is super elevating the NH3 price to protect the higher cost value of the liquid fertilizer inventory, this produces bad thinking on the part of the producer, What is relative?, this is a trick from companies like Koch Industries and Agrium.

The actual wholesale price can be even lower than $280 per ton as price out recently. A good retail price would be $310 per ton.

The Gulf Price of NH3 on Jan. 23, 17 was about $226 per ton.

The demand for NH3 is up a little from $197 per ton of NH3 in late December.

Storage is the key to buying NH3 right and if you are a large producer you should be storing NH3 in 30,000 gallon tanks on your farm.

Retail pricing is somewhere between $450 to $500 per ton which is true if you buy into it….the real price producers with storage pay is about ½ to 2/3 of what the retailer is selling for.

Could it be true, that Ammonia Manufactures have worked together with dealers to fix prices, Ammonia is Ammonia?

The real price of NH3 to the producer should be about 15% to 20% above the cost to build NH3. If the fertilizer company has vertically integrated, then the real producer cost of N as Solution 32 and 28 should be 150% to 160% above the retail price of ammonia, when it is not, the price has been fixed with no competition.

Therefore no one has the relative pricing to the deal. What is the base root and where is the market going when Ammonia is 150% higher than it should be, where is the nitrogen market going?

This is why Anti-Trust must be constantly reviewed to protect our economy and to keep our ethanol industry competitive world wide, There is virtually no risk in building Ammonia and therefore it should be sold at cost plus 15% to 20%.

Wall Street and eastern business schools, that graduate soon to be ruthless market manipulators have produced a serious problem for agriculture. The lack of brisk and competitive pricing precipitates a lot of the problem with the captive Hedge Fund Manager demanding out of sight returns in basic agriculture industrial production.

The deal is always made around the wholesale price…what is the wholesale price for Ammonia? What is the best price producers pay…it is markup off of the wholesale price. NH3 pricing is a stand- alone price or the base root with a futures market maker.

It is difficult to mess with the price of ammonia unless the manufacture can hold back the supply.

The price of Solution 32 or 28-0-0 would always be 150% higher or above NH3 per lb. of N if the fertilizer dealer is protecting the margin. But maybe the dealer is also the manufacturer of the nutrient which allows for specialized accounting techniques. 

NH3 is the highest quality nitrogen when directly applied. Ammonium is what the plant wants.

No producer should ever overpay, in basic crop production when land values are at risk and bankers must be paid and the next generation educated.

Unfortunately the current generation of farmers can not recollect how ammonia and natural gas prices should run together. The relationship changed with the crash of Farmland.

Fertilizer dealers are proposing that customers overpay for NH3 by hiding the cost plus margin and comparing the price to higher cost 32-0-0 and 28-0-0. It is a trick from the biblical trading times.

Lack of correct information, here is a bogus and non detailed report from DTN.

Guy

Also keep in mind it is very difficult for the new or small ammonia producer to enter the market since they must pay for their plant.

Another key might be to build a plant that does not cost so much and enter a locked in market with a guaranteed return. This will work well.

Such is the case in Nebraska. The Husker’s have a new Sheriff in the Platte River Valley. Watch Fertigen at Geneva, NE come on in 2017.

You can beat down the cost of Ammonia another way.

There is another way to reduce the high cost of N and that is to improve the application process with high pressures into liquid steaming flows. The combinations of Exactrix process takes one of the highest quality products on the planet and makes it 166% better reducing cost to about 2/3 of what your neighbor applies.

If you desire the highest quality nitrogen products for your crops you need to review what other Great Plains producers have done. Switch to TAPPS and your budget will have up to $150 more net dollars left over year after year.

A note to DTN reporter Russ Quinn

Russ,

You may have interviewed the Coops without your check book. It appears that you do not look at the actual price of the material as the deals go down.

Late December and January deals are as follows and much lower cost than you are reporting.

If you are a buying customer with cash you have on hand or may have borrowed….. you will discover the price is much lower.

Ammonia Prices in Kansas are priced a lot lower…based on knowledge of the market and by interviewing the producer who is buying the tonnage.

The highest quality nitrogen is 82.4-0-0(Mass Flow) or NH3 has a Jan wholesale price of $250 to $280 per ton.

These prices are based on texted interviews of Exactrix TAPPS formulators. Larger Kansas producers typically.

Retail prices paid by producers that own their own NH3 tanks in Central Kansas is $303 to $308 per ton. The difference is actually 150% higher priced . You need to interview the buyer and bypass the asking price of the Coop…super inflated pricing in tough times.

Retail prices paid by producers in Western Kansas that have own their own NH3 tanks is $310 to $340 per ton.
Hugoton Kansas as an example.



10-34-0 is priced at $341 per ton in Central Kansas such at Clay Center, KS. Once again if you have cash and can take delivery expect to pay a lot less than your quotes you are showing. The difference is actually 128% higher for 10-34-0. We cannot yet confirm reports at $280 to $300 per ton for 10-34-0. We will know next week as the January period closes…. But it appears phosphate is weak and related to NH3 pricing.

12-0-0-26S, or Thio-Sul is $215 per ton in central Kansas. Thio-Sul or ATS is now a very common material and should be included in your articles.

Ammoniated Zinc would also be nice along with KTS.

You need to interview the people that make the deals and write the checks.

Guy Swanson
Exactrix Global Systems
www.exactrix.com
Spokane.

See notes below underlined. GJS

As reported by DTN, Russ Quinn.

Retail fertilizer prices started 2017 the same way they ended 2016 — with some fertilizer prices lower and some higher compared to a month earlier, according to retailers surveyed by DTN the first week of January 2017.

Five of the eight major fertilizers were lower again, although none were considerably lower. DAP with an average price of $431 per ton, MAP $442/ton, 10-34-0 $436/ton, UAN28 $218/ton and UAN32 $255/ton.

The remaining three fertilizers were slightly higher, though none of these moves were significant. Potash had an average price of $322/ton, urea $339/ton and anhydrous $465/ton.

On a price per pound of nitrogen basis, the average urea price was at $0.37/lb.N, anhydrous $0.28/lb.N, UAN28 $0.39/lb.N and UAN32 $0.40/lb.N.

In a presentation at the 2017 Fremont Corn Expo in Fremont, Nebraska, last week, Charles Shapiro, University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) Extension soil science/plant nutrition specialist located at the Haskell Agricultural Laboratory in Concord, spoke about phosphorus (P) fertilizer and maximizing yields while attempting to limit input costs.

One question he said he gets often is: With both corn and soybean yields climbing higher every year, how much P fertilizer should be applied to replace what the previous year’s crops took?

The other question is about building P levels, he said. If you build up P levels in the soil, will it ultimately pay, especially in time of tight crop margins?

“The first thing you want to do is a soil test to know what you have out there,” Shapiro said. “If there is a deficiency, applying P will lead to higher yields; however, we also know as you push fertilizer levels higher there is a lower yield response.”

There is no question that if your soils are low in P, applying the nutrient will raise yields, which pays for the additional cost of fertilizer. This would be for soils with less than 15 parts per million (ppm) of P, he said. Every state has slightly different levels for the critical levels of P depending on the soil type, Shapiro said.

The question is when you are building P — usually in that range above 15 ppm — how much to build to depends on how much money you typically have to spend, Shapiro said.

There is no advantage to building soil test P with commercial fertilizer, the economics do not work…the best results come from making P more crop available annually with TAPPS and No-tillage.

Super ammonization drives P performance with absolute application Uniformity using Exactrix TAPPS makes P more crop available over time. A Time Proven Technique of deep banding at the 8 inch level results in best irrigated and dryland crops.

Producers should spend no more than 12% of the gross income for nutrients. Some are making powerful inroads with VRT at 7% to 8% nutrient cost as compared to the Gross income with Exactrix Uniformity and TAPPS.

The No-till advantage with Rotational Band Loading improves P efficiency with geometry and chemistry…No-till and TAPPS is the key to high profitability west of the Missouri.
GJS

The problem is when building to around 35 ppm to 40 ppm, there is very little yield response to help pay for the increased fertilizer costs, he said. Significant yield responses are usually seen under 15 ppm.

Shapiro said P fertilizers are currently about a third to half the cost of what they were in past years. With lower fertilizer prices, right now would be a good time to invest in nutrients, he said.

“If you did happen to have extra money, the price of P is pretty cheap right now, and so it would be a good time to invest,” he said.

Retail fertilizers are lower compared to a year earlier. All fertilizers are now double digits lower.

Urea is now down 11%, DAP is 13% less expensive, MAP is 15% lower and potash is 18% less expensive. UAN32 is 19% lower while both anhydrous and UAN28 are 20% less expensive and 10-34-0 is 24% lower compared to a year prior.

DTN collects roughly 1,700 retail fertilizer bids from 310 retailer locations weekly. Not all fertilizer prices change each week. Prices are subject to change at any time.

DTN Pro Grains subscribers can find current retail fertilizer price in the DTN Fertilizer Index on the Fertilizer page under Farm Business.

Retail fertilizer charts dating back to 2010 are available in the DTN fertilizer segment. The charts included cost of N/lb., DAP, MAP, potash, urea, 10-34-0, anhydrous, UAN28 and UAN32.

DTN’s average of retail fertilizer prices from a month earlier ($ per ton):

Russ Quinn can be reached at russ.quinn@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @RussQuinnDTN

John Cory Security West Financial

Call your new banker, John Cory, Security West Financial. http://swfinco.com/contact.html   (509) 994-8555 You can go off the balance sheet and work with the best using the strength of Farm Credit and others. John will help you spend about $40,000 annually to make $150,000 more annually by spending only $60 per acre in irrigated production for fertilizer. John understands the cycles of agriculture and how to keep your balance sheet looking good. At the end of five years you will own a powerful machine that continue to produce good returns having already been paid for at the end of the first year.  You can even apply for your neighbors with a Mustang Tool Bar. At 1,000 acres of corn, An internal bottom line savings of $750,000 over five years on 5,000 acres of corn.   An Exactrix Mustang Tool Bar capable of producing $550,000 of internally available funds in five years.

See Video
Top yields, best margin and the new leader in VRT-Site Specific, Small Grains Expert. Eric Odberg at Genesee, Idaho breaking winter wheat yield records. Exactrix TAPPS at Catholic Canyon using 4 management zones. Exactrix Site-Specific, Variable Rate EO.htm	"Paul Gangwish, Drone Video" Track Machines improve production 200%. Application time cut in half at 1 acre per minute. Up to $150 more net income per acre.

The 2017 Agronomy Review.
http://www.exactrix.com/Broadcast_12_29_2016.html